The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Weblogs Forum
On Naming an Operation for Cat

18 replies on 2 pages. Most recent reply: Sep 13, 2006 2:25 AM by Phillip Wright

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 18 replies on 2 pages [ « | 1 2 ]
Robbert van Dalen

Posts: 5
Nickname: rapido
Registered: Jun, 2006

Re: On Naming an Operation for Cat Posted: Sep 7, 2006 10:25 AM
Reply to this message Reply
Advertisement
I like explode to be the best suggustion so far.

Christopher Diggins

Posts: 1215
Nickname: cdiggins
Registered: Feb, 2004

Re: On Naming an Operation for Cat Posted: Sep 7, 2006 12:52 PM
Reply to this message Reply
What about "decompose"?


define f = { g h }

@f decompose // = (@g, @h)


By definition f is the compose of g and h.

Vincent O'Sullivan

Posts: 724
Nickname: vincent
Registered: Nov, 2002

Re: On Naming an Operation for Cat Posted: Sep 8, 2006 5:45 AM
Reply to this message Reply
> define f = { g h }
>
> By definition f is the compose of g and h.

I know I'm just being pedantic but by what definition? There's no such noun as compose.

f can, however, said to be the composite of g and h.

Phillip Wright

Posts: 2
Nickname: pwright
Registered: Sep, 2006

Re: On Naming an Operation for Cat Posted: Sep 13, 2006 2:25 AM
Reply to this message Reply
Still sounds like explode to me...

Flat View: This topic has 18 replies on 2 pages [ « | 1  2 ]
Topic: On Naming an Operation for Cat Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Netbeans JMI programming...


Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2014 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Advertise with Us