<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

  <rdf:RDF
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  >

  <channel rdf:about="http://www.artima.com/weblogs/index.jsp?blogger=btmurphy">
    <title>Brian Murphy's Weblog</title>
    <description>
Qu'est Que C'est? ... Fa Fa Fa Fa
    </description>
    <link>http://www.artima.com/weblogs/index.jsp?blogger=btmurphy</link>
    <image rdf:resource="http://www.artima.com/images/artima88x33.gif" />
   <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=6902" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>

  <image rdf:about="http://www.artima.com/images/artima88x33.gif">
    <title>Artima.com</title>
    <url>http://www.artima.com/images/artima88x33.gif</url>
    <link>http://www.artima.com/</link>
  </image>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=6902">
    <title>Java's Real Value Proposition</title>
    <link>http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=6902</link>
    <description>
In his essay titled, &quot;Java's Cover&quot;, Paul Graham
explains why he thinks Java is a &quot;stinker&quot;. 
Although some of the points made are valid,
there are many misconceptions that are unfair or outright
wrong, and need to be corrected. More importantly, 
Dr. Graham seems to miss the real value propostion of
Java as a language and platform. (From Brian Murphy's Weblog)
    </description>
  </item>

</rdf:RDF>
