Weblogs Forum - On Naming an Operation for Cat

Articles |
News |
Weblogs |
Books |
Forums

Artima Forums | Articles | Weblogs | Java Answers | News

Sponsored Link •

Weblogs Forum
On Naming an Operation for Cat

18 replies on 2 pages. Most recent reply: Sep 12, 2006 11:25 PM by Phillip Wright

Welcome Guest
Sign In

Back to Topic List

Reply to this Topic

Search Forum

Threaded View


Previous Topic		Next Topic

Flat View: This topic has 18 replies on 2 pages [ « | 1 2 ]

Robbert van Dalen

Posts: 5
Nickname: rapido
Registered: Jun, 2006

Re: On Naming an Operation for Cat

Posted: Sep 7, 2006 7:25 AM

I like explode to be the best suggustion so far.

Christopher Diggins

Posts: 1215
Nickname: cdiggins
Registered: Feb, 2004

Re: On Naming an Operation for Cat

Posted: Sep 7, 2006 9:52 AM

What about "decompose"?


define f = { g h } 

@f decompose // = (@g, @h)

By definition f is the compose of g and h.

Vincent O'Sullivan

Posts: 724
Nickname: vincent
Registered: Nov, 2002

Re: On Naming an Operation for Cat

Posted: Sep 8, 2006 2:45 AM

> define f = { g h }
>
> By definition f is the compose of g and h.

I know I'm just being pedantic but by what definition? There's no such noun as compose.

f can, however, said to be the composite of g and h.

Phillip Wright

Posts: 2
Nickname: pwright
Registered: Sep, 2006

Re: On Naming an Operation for Cat

Posted: Sep 12, 2006 11:25 PM

Still sounds like explode to me...

Flat View: This topic has 18 replies on 2 pages [ « | 1 2 ]

Previous Topic

Next Topic


	Web Artima.com