Joao Pedrosa
Posts: 114
Nickname: dewd
Registered: Dec, 2005
|
|
Re: Are Ruby's Open Classes a Poor Fit for Large Projects?
|
Posted: Aug 27, 2006 6:18 PM
|
|
I'm not sure about the claims that Python is going to rule anything, because it's not of wishes that castles are made of. I do hope Python succeeds, though, because I would hate to keep hearing how great it is and yet it's not so used, like LISP sounds sometimes.
Also, what's Python evolving into? With the needs for more "enterprisey" features for Python, because Google and Microsoft (IronPython) require it, maybe Python might lose momentum as well.
On the other hand, for Java, I see it being fought on the high-end by .NET and its one-platform approach, generally. And being fougt by the low-end by Ruby and Python, to name two, though other languages are welcome to the party. After all, it's the low-end. :-) The low-end tries to appeal to cross-platformness as well.
Now, with Windows Vista leveling the .NET playground on Windows, in 5 years other languages might be able to explore it better than the current ones. Ruby.NET, for instance, has been already started. If it keeps true to its nature, I'm sure it will have a future of its own, as the most dynamic language in the world. While Python might try to appeal to more static typeness for one thing, leaving Ruby alone on the low-end. On the high-end, fierce competition will exist, as C# will be there, powering and being powered by many tools. And on the low-end, JavaScript-like languages might try to take some of the market to themselves. After all, JavaScript is plenty known and has plenty of appeal.
All I know is that a "Winner" that's on paper only is not all that.
|
|