The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Weblogs Forum
Talibanism in Technology?

16 replies. Most recent reply: Feb 6, 2004 4:21 AM by Deepa Kandaswamy

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a flat view of this topic  Flat View
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Threaded View: This topic has 16 replies on 1 page
John D. Mitchell

Posts: 244
Nickname: johnm
Registered: Apr, 2003

Talibanism in Technology? (View in Weblogs) Posted: Jan 10, 2004 4:53 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Summary
Are women systematically invisible in the tech industry?

Deepa Kandaswamy articulates his "seven reasons why women in technology remain invisible..." in Talibanism in Technology.

Do you think there's a problem? If so, is there hope? What do you think we can do to address the problem?


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 10, 2004 9:19 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Chris Dailey    Posts: 56 / Nickname: mouse / Registered: Dec, 2002
Do you think there is a problem?

I think there is a problem. It's not just in technical fields, however. It's systemic, it's cultural.

From my personal vantage point, I will enjoy working with someone if they think through issues, are considerate, are competent, and are productive. I won't enjoy working with someone if they're bossy, do poor work, or are annoying. Regardless of gender.

Though I'm not particularly in a position of power to make changes to the situation. But armchair quarterbacking, there need to be more women who are taught technical things when growing up and more women who are trained in the field. The rest of society will drag behind, but will eventually catch up.


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 12, 2004 9:50 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: John D. Mitchell    Posts: 244 / Nickname: johnm / Registered: Apr, 2003
> Do you think there is a problem?

Yes I do. However, I don't think it's a simplistic as the author makes out.


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 12, 2004 12:22 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Jordan Zimmerman    Posts: 23 / Nickname: jordanz / Registered: Jul, 2003
What about these "invisible" women:

* Carly Fiorina
* Esther Dyson
* Adele Goldberg
* Ellen Hancock
* Meg Whitman
* Carol Bartz
* Kim Polese
...


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 12, 2004 2:23 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Merriodoc Brandybuck    Posts: 225 / Nickname: brandybuck / Registered: Mar, 2003
> What about these "invisible" women:
>
> * Carly Fiorina
> * Esther Dyson
> * Adele Goldberg
> * Ellen Hancock
> * Meg Whitman
> * Carol Bartz
> * Kim Polese
> ...

Myth 8 "Women are invisible in technology".

Not to mention the use of Talibanism is just a horrible comparison. It doesn't even come close. I think the use of Talibanism could be in some corollary to Godwin's Law.


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 12, 2004 9:43 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: John D. Mitchell    Posts: 244 / Nickname: johnm / Registered: Apr, 2003
> Not to mention the use of Talibanism is just a horrible
> comparison. It doesn't even come close. I think the use of
> Talibanism could be in some corollary to Godwin's Law.

I wholeheartedly concur.

John


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 13, 2004 3:43 AM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Paul Mitchell-Gears    Posts: 1 / Nickname: paulmg / Registered: Jan, 2004
Deepa Kandaswamy seems to be very taken by the idea that conditioning is everything (ie nurture > nature).

Steven Pinker's book 'The Blank Slate' (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0670031518/qid=1073993602/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_1/104-0679679-5551919) provides a very balanced view of this whole debate. The message that I took from it is that some things really are determined by birth, despite the political benefits of pretending that everything about a person can be changed, and yet some things really can be changed, despite the received wisdom of society that they are 'there by birth'.

The point being: don't necessarily trust your (societally-informed) intuition about eg whether women make good programmers; read scientific studies (or analyses of those, such as this book) which show evidence one way or the other.


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 13, 2004 11:52 AM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Carol Johnson    Posts: 1 / Nickname: cj / Registered: Jan, 2004
Interesting that the writer assumed the author of the article is a man. Deepa is a woman!


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 13, 2004 8:51 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: John D. Mitchell    Posts: 244 / Nickname: johnm / Registered: Apr, 2003
Bing! You win the prize as the only person who noticed.


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 13, 2004 10:27 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Deepa Kandaswamy    Posts: 2 / Nickname: dak1234 / Registered: Jan, 2004
Thanks for making the point of "invisibility " for me by referring to me as a man!

If anyone doubts the invisibility of women in tech now, apparently even our names are assumed to be male!

I can only assume that while you think the article may be good, it couldn't be written by a woman.

Shows the social conditioning :)


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 14, 2004 6:57 AM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Merriodoc Brandybuck    Posts: 225 / Nickname: brandybuck / Registered: Mar, 2003
> Thanks for making the point of "invisibility " for me by
> referring to me as a man!
>
> If anyone doubts the invisibility of women in tech now,
> apparently even our names are assumed to be male!
>
> I can only assume that while you think the article may be
> good, it couldn't be written by a woman.
>
> Shows the social conditioning :)

I'll be the first to admit that I didn't notice the 'his'. I'll also be the first to admit I had assumed you were a woman. Probably because of a sweeping generalization that, since women are invisible, a man wouldn't waste his time writing about an invisible topic unless it was

Given the amount of typos and mistakes in online comment, I tend to make a point of ignoring such things. 'his' vs. 'her' has no useful content for me in a weblog. I've read plenty of stuff with 'her' as the supposedly gender neutral pronoun. Which 'his' and 'he' are used in a gender neutral sense and legally so, mind you. You stumble over it at first. You get used to it. Now, because of it, I ignore the pronouns. In my PC societal BS programmed mind (mostly a failed attempt, really), I just substituted 'the' for 'his'. The post didn't have anything worthwhile (sorry John, really :-) except for the link to your article. Why bother reading it in that level of detail? Or am I the only one that skims for useful content when reading on the internet because of the poor grammar, poor spelling and, a lot of the times, poor content?

If only one person in 8 or so noticing the 'his' in the reference to the article is proof of invisibility in technology, then we must all be complete idiots, as indicated by our horrible grasp of spelling. I can only speak for me and my brother in law when I say that coding has ruined any chance either of us has at becoming spelling bee champions.

So, I guess you can be happy that the attempt at PC brainwashing I recieved at the University of Michigan must have had some effect on one poor white middle class male who is, by all counts, the scourge of the Earth. Gender has been rendered irrelevant. Damn, and I remember liking feminimity, too. Now when I get home tonight, I'll have to go and make sure that I did, in fact, marry a woman.

<sigh>


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 14, 2004 10:48 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: John D. Mitchell    Posts: 244 / Nickname: johnm / Registered: Apr, 2003
[...]
> Given the amount of typos and mistakes in online comment,
> I tend to make a point of ignoring such things. 'his' vs.
> 'her' has no useful content for me in a weblog. I've read
> plenty of stuff with 'her' as the supposedly gender
> neutral pronoun. Which 'his' and 'he' are used in a gender
> neutral sense and legally so, mind you. You stumble over
> it at first. You get used to it. Now, because of it, I
> ignore the pronouns. In my PC societal BS programmed mind
> (mostly a failed attempt, really), I just substituted
> 'the' for 'his'. The post didn't have anything worthwhile
> (sorry John, really :-) except for the link to your
> article. Why bother reading it in that level of detail? Or
> am I the only one that skims for useful content when
> reading on the internet because of the poor grammar, poor
> spelling and, a lot of the times, poor content?

No worries, no offense taken at this end.

IMVHO, your rationalization is a wonderful example of exactly the same underlying issue.

[...]
> feminimity, too. Now when I get home tonight, I'll have to
> go and make sure that I did, in fact, marry a woman.

LOL! Thanks!


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 15, 2004 8:02 AM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Merriodoc Brandybuck    Posts: 225 / Nickname: brandybuck / Registered: Mar, 2003
I think the bigger issue, in most cases, is that in some cases gender very much matters and in others it is supposed to be ignored. To take the pregnancy example cited in the article.

"Working hours required and the social set up for the jobs in the technical field demand quite different commitments. This directly affects the socially defined role of a woman as a nurturer. Therefore most women feel there is a lack of balance in their lives and this leads to guilt. In Californian Law, pregnancy itself is considered a disability with a note from your doctor."

Many people I know who have been pregnant have been too sick to work for fairly long periods. So they take the time off they need. That's fine. Not having ever personally endured a pregnancy, I can't say what's what. But then on the other hand they are supposed to get the same consideration in their employment as the people who plug away at their jobs day in and day out? That strikes me as horribly unfair. My wifes morning sickness for both our kids, if she was working, would not have let her work. That law would have helped her. It is painted in a poor light in this article.

And I do believe, whether you want to admit it or not, that women and men are wired differently. This is a generalization. As such it applies in the general case, not every case. It isn't like stereotypes, societal roles and generalizations form in a vacuum.

This is not to say that people shouldn't be judged by their merits and allowed to pursue the course they determine is best for them. I can also say that I have been lucky enough to not have been in work environments like those described in the article, so perhaps I don't have the same perspective as the author.

I think the article, like most of what I've seen and read on this issue, tries to have it both ways in a lot of cases. You can't. Things just don't work that way. Of course, I could be guilty of what I'm about to say below and reading things into the article that aren't there ;-)

And I don't see how my missing a pronoun proves your point. One one hand you say that gender shouldn't matter. If that's the case, then the pronoun shouldn't matter. If it shouldn't matter, then it should be invisible. Women should be invisible. Men should be invisible. People and their accomplishments should be the only thing that is visible. I think my 'rationalization' is merely a symptom of what I describe and that too much is being read into it. It's like the people that believe the Lord of the Rings was heavily influence by the events of WWII because it was released afterwords. They are finding things that aren't there. The story was written well before Hitler's rise to power. Sauron is not Hitler.

If you look hard enough, you tend to find what you're looking for, whether it is there or not.

At least, that is my VHO.


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 14, 2004 10:35 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: John D. Mitchell    Posts: 244 / Nickname: johnm / Registered: Apr, 2003
Sigh, you missed the whole point... The male pronoun was used on purpose precisely to get at the issue.


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 18, 2004 1:30 AM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Paul Rivers    Posts: 24 / Nickname: paulrivers / Registered: May, 2003
I've always said that women aren't as good as men at programming. And I've found in college that this is true. Because women aren't willing the spend the hours and hours it takes to get good at these time consuming technical subjects. What I mean is, women aren't stupid enough to waste years of their lives sitting in front of a computer, alone, in a socially and emotionally void environment. I see this a lot at school - guys will work on a program of their own, alone, for a long time, whereas girls think "Wait, why would I spend so many hours on code no one will ever find useful anyways?". The stupid girls _are_ to emotional to do technical things. The smart girls are too smart to beat themselves against the unfeeling, uncaring machine. There's also another occupation that you don't see many girls doing - serial killing.


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Jan 18, 2004 2:28 PM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Kathy Sierra    Posts: 1 / Nickname: ksierra / Registered: Jan, 2004
I'm a woman. I've been working as a developer for the last 15 years. I have absolutely no idea what the author is talking about!

I've never once felt that anything that happened in my career (at least anything *bad*) because I'm female. When I annoy people, it's because I'm annoying. Not because I'm a woman.

When I piss people off, it's usually because I did something stupid. Or irresponsible.

Sure, sometimes I piss people off because I tend toward speaking the *truth* (often involving whether something is, in fact, naked) but again, that has nothing to do with my being female.

Was I just lucky enough to work for a company where it wasn't an issue? Maybe. But 15 of them? If the problem is as pervasive as some believe, you'd think I'd have encountered a problem at least *once*, somewhere? What are the odds?

Nor have I found a single female friend (and most of my female friends are also in the technology world) who can recall it being a problem. And we've all been hired, at one time or another, into our dream jobs.

And if just one more person says, "See, it's so ingrained that you don't even see it." I think I'm going to throw up. I'm not saying there isn't sexist behavior (although much of what people call sexist I still find to be more *sexy*), but even ackknowledging sexist behavior still doesn't *necessarily* mean some horrible problem exists in the US IT world or that women are treated unfairly as a result.

I *have* heard women complain; when I worked at Sun, every once in a while I'd have one look at me with that, "Yeah, WE know that our problems are because we're not one of the boys." And she'd expect me to give that knowing nod. But I just couldn't. Not that I had the heart to say, "Well, if your performance was up to everyone else's maybe it wouldn't be a problem?"

On the other hand, I met tons of kick-ass women. Many wore skirts. Some, on the short side. Because they *felt* like it. Hell, if I'm a programmer, it's not like the computer cares if I'm wearing only lingerie when I write code. That's one of the reasons I find computers to be so *refreshing* -- it doesn't take extreme muscle strength. I could not, for example, expect to be hired as a fire fighter. Nor would I be pleased to be in a burning building and see ME coming up the ladder for the big rescue. Because I weigh 100 pounds. I'm not carrying *anyone* but the cat out of that building. So, is that sexist? I wouldn't feel happy seeing a 100 pound GUY coming up that ladder either. It's a size thing, not gender.

But my computer (especially my VERY sexy G4 Titanium) is just as likely (or sometimes, I swear, *more* likely) to provide me with a smooth development environment as it is to respond to a man. My curly brace looks just like Bill's. (perhaps a *tad* curvier, but nothing really to write home about ; )

Personally, sure, it would be fun to have more women involved in technology. Then again, I wouldn't be able to have my own private bathroom stall at JavaOne.

But for that matter, it's not just *women* who are missing from JavaOne. There just isn't a lot of diversity period. I'm sure there are very different reasons--I doubt that women aren't well-represented in IT for the same reasons that some other ethnic group is not well-represented.

Maybe it starts in school, but I'm not so convinced of that either. I have a daughter who looks like she just stepped off a teen fashion magazine. She loves the mall and her iPod. She's also off-the-charts smart and culturally brilliant. She can tell you who directed a movie just by watching it. She studies latin *for fun*. She knows more about the music indie scene than anyone I've ever *read* or *heard of*. She's quite good at math, when she wants to be.

But she isn't *interested* in being a programmer. That's it. No big horror story about how the boys and unwitting teachers convinced her at an early age that "this is not for girls." For one thing, she would have cared less if they tried. For another, she doesn't see programming as being any different from *other* things she does with her computer. For god's sake, she edits with Final Cut Pro--the same tools used to cut major motion pictures today. She does this in school, right along side the boys. She does extremely sophisticated work with her computer, including web site development. WhenI tried to ask her about how the girls at school are treated in the computer lab, she looks at me as though I'm nuts. She, too, has no idea what I'm talking about. As though I'm one of those parents that's so hopelessly stuck in the past that I have no CLUE what it's like today. Now, having to walk through a metal detector (she attended school in the same school district as Columbine)... now THAT is an issue she can tell you about. Drug testing. Locker searches. But sexism in the math/science/computer department? Huh? [blank look]

I think that in many cases, *not being interested* really means nothing more than *not being interested*. We *are* wired differently. Perhaps I'm brain damaged. If so, I'm grateful, because I love creating software. But it just makes me crazy when I hear people act as though it just a GIVEN that women are treated badly in IT, at least in the US (I absolutely CANNOT speak about other countries).

I love being female. I don't ever try to *hide* that, or *minimize* it or *suppress* it so that I'd be taken seriously. I've even been known to exploit it (no, not THAT way). If my team doesn't respect me, I really need to look at reasons *other* than my gender. Sure, I DO believe that there probably are some pockets of IT where perhaps an entire division is simply convinced that women shouldn't be taken seriously. I've never seen it, never heard any other woman I know speak of it, but I can believe that's true. But I think that's more and more the exception, not the rule.

And yes, I've experienced working a trade show booth where sometimes men (and women) instinctively assume that I'm the marketing person, not the programmer. I get a kick out of them going to the guy in the booth who points out, "Oh, she's the one who wrote it... she's the guru, so you better ask her..."
And as a woman, you know what? If a guy mistakes me for a "booth babe/demo doll" I tend to take that as a compliment. Never once has it affected my ability to convince him that I knew what I was talking about.

I actually went out to dinner once with a guy who, it turned out, admitted he *hit on me* at the coffeeshop ONLY because I was reading an AI magazine. Turns out, he wasn't interested in dating me at all. He just wanted someone to talk AI with. Talk about a hit to a girl's ego... ; )

Anyway, I'm a woman who has spent many years in this business in all aspects, and worked with many women in this business. I've been a game developer, an enterprise application developer, a professional services consultant. I am a best-selling tech book author (I certainly can't say that having a woman's name on a programming book has caused buyers to look elsewhere). I won an award at Sun for having the highest customer-satisfaction rating over the course of a year, when I was teaching early adopters how to use EJB. If there were men in my classrooms who thought, "A WOMAN is teaching this? She can't possibly be any good..." they got over it quickly.
I've been hired, promoted, given outrageous salaries, and been fired, passed over, treated badly. I cannot attribute a single *bad* thing to being female. If pressed, though, I probably can come up with *good* things.

I care desperately about the world into which my daughter is coming of age. But sexism in the technical world is NOT one of the problems either of us have ever spent a moment fretting about. She's concerned about the environment, the deficit, the lack of tolerance. Health care. Guns. The government. She just doesn't make distinctions between knowing about *famous women* and *famous men*. It's all about the work they do. Her idol is Sofia Coppola, because her favorite movie now is "Lost in Translation." (despite it's obvious handicap, in her opinion— no characters portrayed by Orlando Bloom ; ) and we have a huge picture of Amelia Earhart on the wall; another woman with whom she's fascinated.

I think that perpetuating the myth that "everyone knows there's a big problem with sexism and discrimination against women in IT" is just as dangerous as perpetuating the myth that "women can't be technical". And in my opinion, there are far more men who believe in the first myth, today, then who actually believe in the latter. Yes, there are still some dinosaurs out there still working, but these older Archie Bunker types are being phased out through the passage of time. I believe that the *problem* such as it might still exist in some areas, just continues to diminish each day as the number of workers raised in a more modern era (and by *parents* who were raised after, say, the 60's) continues to rise.

-Kathy Sierra


Re: Talibanism in Technology? Posted: Feb 6, 2004 4:21 AM
Reply to this message Reply
Posted by: Deepa Kandaswamy    Posts: 2 / Nickname: dak1234 / Registered: Jan, 2004
Kathy makes some good points. I’ve had similar experiences like you as I didn’t have to experience any sort of discrimination because I was a woman engineer.

The argument I or people I know didn’t experience it proves it doesn’t exist – well your premise is fundamentally
flawed.

It's like saying I didn’t go through what Sushmita Banerjee (who managed to escape from the Taliban and lived to tell her story) or Saba Sameer (an Afghani woman) went through under the Taliban, proves their experiences were exaggerated.

Same is true for experiences of other women in the technical field.

Just because Kathy or I didn’t experience it, doesn’t mean other women aren’t going through it.

I was extremely careful that women in tech who I interviewed didn’t attribute their failure which was due to incompetence to just because they were "women". Those who did, I left out and still the majority, women who succeeded had experienced discrimination because they were women and nothing else.

Please re-read the whole article. You’ll notice I didn’t come up with these on reasons on my own. It took me over 6 months to research this piece and I also point out reasons where women need to improve if they want to be “seen”.

“Environment” in which you are raised, live & work all play a key role. Many women like me can say "assert yourself and all will be fine" for I have never had any bad experiences in my life and I’m successful as a businesswoman and writer. However, this is a lame duck statement because we refuse to look beyond our environment and see how other women despite intelligence and competence get discriminated against just because they are women.

Bhanwari Devi, a brave villager asserted herself – she tried to stop a child marriage in a village in the north Indian state of Rajasthan. As punishment she was gang raped while the entire village watched. It was not due to lack of assertive behaviour but the environment played a factor. This would have never happened in the southern states, or metros in India.

I can quote several such instances of harassment of women in the developed and developing world in the technical field too now and in the past.

If you are really interested, I suggest you work for one month in the Affirmative Actions office on any University campus or work abroad in other countries which also have similar organisations. It’ll be an eye opener.

Some one posted that women are just screaming discrimination. That made me smile. Any man who thinks his rights are being stepped over when a woman with equal qualification and experience gets the job has to re-examine his views on gender and if he really grasps the term EQUALITY

John & Merriodoc, you are right --Talibanism as a title is not appropriate but I came up with the word to provoke people into debate and it appears to have worked :-)


Topic: What Good is a Tree When All You Have is a Computer? Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Farewell, JavaWorld, and Thanks

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use