Eric Hodel
Posts: 660
Nickname: drbrain
Registered: Mar, 2006
|
Eric Hodel is a long-time Rubyist and co-founder of Seattle.rb.
|
|
|
|
Notes on Heckle
|
Posted: Feb 12, 2007 3:06 PM
|
|
|
This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz
by Eric Hodel.
|
Original Post: Notes on Heckle
Feed Title: Segment7
Feed URL: http://blog.segment7.net/articles.rss
Feed Description: Posts about and around Ruby, MetaRuby, ruby2c, ZenTest and work at The Robot Co-op.
|
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Eric Hodel
Latest Posts From Segment7
|
|
When I started heckle I was hoping for somehing better than rcov that would tell you that your code is poorly tested… But code so poorly engineered that changing anything as bound to make everything fall apart looks like well tested (read: heckle-proof) code in a sense. We both think that running just the unit tests that directly test the MUT (method under test) would help, but really it wouldn’t help enough. [...]
Suggestions? How would you differentiate between “well tested” and “tightly coupled crap”?
—Notes on Heckle via Polishing Ruby
I’m puzzled by this too. How can we detect well-tested vs tightly-coupled (and poorly tested) code automatically?
Read: Notes on Heckle
|
|