|
This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Web Buzz
by Stuart Langridge.
|
Original Post: A tale of UI chains
Feed Title: as days pass by
Feed URL: http://feeds.feedburner.com/kryogenix
Feed Description: scratched tallies on the prison wall
|
Latest Web Buzz Posts
Latest Web Buzz Posts by Stuart Langridge
Latest Posts From as days pass by
|
|
or, big UI oaks do from little tech decisions grow
or, how Thunderbird screwed me a bit, although it might be my own fault
I have five levels of caring about email.* They are:
- Don't care
- I've dealt with this
- I probably ought to deal with this, or it prompts a thought, or something
- I need to deal with this
- I really, really need to deal with this
These levels get mapped to my inbox in the following ways:
- Deleted
- Archived (in an Archive folder)
- In the inbox, read
- In the inbox, unread
- In the inbox, flagged Important (and probably marked unread too)
In four years of dealing with my work inbox through Evolution, this scheme
has stood me in good stead. However, at the weekend I moved to Thunderbird 9,
and two days later it screwed me. Or I screwed myself while it stood by and
laughed. Or something. And it's all because my work IMAP account doesn't seem
to have a Trash folder. Follow the bouncing ball...
When you set up a new IMAP account in Thunderbird, it asks where you want
deleted messages to go. The default setting is "Move it to this folder:
Deleted", which is what I have set for my gmail account.

However, for my work account, this complained that there was no such folder.
Now, there's a Deleted folder, with little green rubbish bin icon*,
in the left-hand sidebar under my work account as well. Clicking on that also
says that "The current operation on 'Deleted' did not succeed. The mail server
for account (myworkemail) responded: Mailbox doesn't exist: Trash."
OK, thought I... maybe that's not meant to work. Perhaps Canonical IS don't
want me storing all my deleted emails on the server or something. However, I
can't find a way of specifying a local folder as the Deleted folder for my
IMAP account.
Now, I delete mail by accident all the time. So I was rather too scared to
set "Remove [the mail] immediately" as my what-happens-when-I-press-delete-by-accident
thing. Hence, the other option is to "just mark [the email] as deleted". What
this does is it strikes through the line describing the email in my
inbox, so I can later on "undelete" it if I want. That seemed OK for a couple
of days. However (this is the second level of however), what that actually means
is that you end up with the list of emails you can see in the window all being
struck through, which is annoying. So I need a way of saying "fine, all those
deleted emails are actually deleted and not just me hitting delete by accident",
and that's "Compact" on the folder context menu.

However (third however level), immediately below "Compact" is "Mark Folder
Read". So you can see that an inept person might accidentally click on the
wrong menu item, and that's exactly what I did. And now I can't tell the
difference between the 200 emails that I need to deal with and the other 200
that I might want to think about at some point, which is extremely
irritating. All because I don't understand why my work email doesn't have a
Trash folder.
I can't really blame the Thunderbird team for this. (Not that that
stopped me when I did it, but I calmed down.) "Mark Folder Read" and "Compact"
are both destructive, non-reversible actions. They're both
hidden on a folder context menu, a place for experts. If I bitch that I ought to
be able to undo making a folder read, then I should also bitch that I ought to
be able to undo compacting, and that defeats the point: compacting is itself the
undo mechanism for deleting! So I'm screwed and it's no-one else's fault, which
normally means (reluctantly) that it's my fault.
Some of you will now be thinking: that's what you get for indicating a
permanent state ("I need to deal with this") with an ephemeral marker (read
status). And you're right, I suppose. However, email has an Important flag and
that's it. There isn't an Important and a Very Important flag. Oh, there might
be extensions to add that, but I'd want the status to show up, and be
changeable, from the folder list (not just from an individual email). So clearly
I need to change my habits. Perhaps there's an extension which colours the lines
in the folder list differently depending on a flag I add? If I can change that
colour from the folder list then that might be a good approach. How do you deal
with differing levels of importance in email? Your thoughts are invited.
Read: A tale of UI chains