The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Java Buzz Forum
Static Typing Is Not for Type Checking

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
justin cater

Posts: 19616
Nickname: justin78
Registered: Mar, 2011

Justin Cater is executive editor at Java Code Geeks
Static Typing Is Not for Type Checking Posted: Dec 4, 2014 5:20 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz by justin cater.
Original Post: Static Typing Is Not for Type Checking
Feed Title: Java Code Geeks
Feed URL: http://feeds.feedburner.com/JavaCodeGeeks
Feed Description: Java 2 Java Developers Resource Center
Latest Java Buzz Posts
Latest Java Buzz Posts by justin cater
Latest Posts From Java Code Geeks

Advertisement

In his post “Strong typing vs strong testing” Bruce Eckel described the idea, that statically (or strongly) typed languages don’t give you much, because you should verify your programs with tests anyway, and those tests will check the types as well – no need for the compiler to do that (especially if it makes you […]

Read: Static Typing Is Not for Type Checking

Topic: java.nio.channels.AsynchronousSocketChannel Example Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Continuous Deployment: Introduction

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use