The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Ruby Buzz Forum
Thread.new(info)

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Daniel Berger

Posts: 1383
Nickname: djberg96
Registered: Sep, 2004

Daniel Berger is a Ruby Programmer who also dabbles in C and Perl
Thread.new(info) Posted: Jul 17, 2005 5:20 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz by Daniel Berger.
Original Post: Thread.new(info)
Feed Title: Testing 1,2,3...
Feed URL: http://djberg96.livejournal.com/data/rss
Feed Description: A blog on Ruby and other stuff.
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Daniel Berger
Latest Posts From Testing 1,2,3...

Advertisement
In a thread entitled Cheapest ping possible, Eric Hodel points out something interesting. In his followup he mentions that the OP should use a ThreadGroup instead of a plain array of threads to join later.

Why? Eric says, "A ThreadGroup doesn't hang on to dead threads, so if a thread finishes it will be garbage collected."

Good to know. :)

Read: Thread.new(info)

Topic: Convincing those CxO’s to see beyond Struts Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Rails 0.13 and typo

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use