The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Ruby Buzz Forum
Git SVN Workflow

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Andy Delcambre

Posts: 66
Nickname: adelcambre
Registered: Sep, 2007

Andy Delcambre is a developer at PLANET ARGON
Git SVN Workflow Posted: Mar 4, 2008 10:45 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz by Andy Delcambre.
Original Post: Git SVN Workflow
Feed Title: Andy Delcambre
Feed URL: http://feeds.feedburner.com/andydelcambre
Feed Description: Andy has been using Ruby and Ruby on Rails since 2006 and has been working with Ruby on Rails professionally since June 2007.
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Andy Delcambre
Latest Posts From Andy Delcambre

Advertisement

I know, I know, this is blog post number one million about Git and git-svn. This is primarily for my co-workers who are wanting to switch to git for our SVN based projects like I have. (If I get them with git-svn, next we can start hosting with git directly, Muhahaha!)

First, a bit of background. Git was written by Linus Torvalds specifically for use by the linux kernel team. He had very specific ideas about how the version control system should work, and none of the offerings at that time satisfied his needs. Git is designed to be distributed (every clone is a full fledged git repository) and very very fast. It is also designed to be very easy not only to branch, but also to merge.

Disclaimer: This is not intended to be the “correct” way to use git + svn, only the way that I use it. That said, here we go.

First, we assume that you have a subversion repository at http://example.com/svn/my_proj. You will need to create the git repo setup to pull from this repo.


git svn init -s http://example.com/svn/my_proj

This will initialize the git repo for pulling from svn. The -s indicates that you have a “standard” setup for your subversion repository. I.e. trunk/ branches/ and tags/. This command will not yet import anything from subversion.


git svn fetch

This command will fetch all revisions from subversion that you have not yet received. The first time you run this could take quite a while. There are options to only fetch some of the revisions, but I prefer to fetch the whole history the first time. This way blame and log show the whole thing.

Now you will have both the whole revision history for trunk, but also all of the branches on the svn server. You can see all of the branches with

git branch -a

This will show all branches, including the remote branches.

Now that you have the entire subversion history stored locally, it can be useful to repack the repository. Right now, each revision has it’s own file, this command will pack those into bigger “pack” files. This will make the repository smaller, but also with many many fewer files


git repack -d

Next you will want to do some actual work on the repository. It is not recommended to make changes in your master branch, so lets make a branch for the new feature.


git checkout -b new_feature

This will make a new branch (the -b) and switch to it (checkout). Once you have your new branch you make a bunch of changes and add a new file or two. You need to add any new files so git knows to track them. You can do this with:


git add path/to/new_file

Now, once you are happy with this new feature and have it tested. You can commit it to git. This is one place where git diverges from subversion. Files you have changed aren’t automatically staged for committing. So right now if you try to commit, you will commit the file that you added in the above command, but nothing you changed (adding a file stages it). So you have two options at this point, you can manually stage each file you want to commit, you will want to do it this way if you don’t want to commit all the changes you have made. That will look something like


git add path/to/edited_file
git add another/edited/file
git commit -m "commit message" 

If you want to commit all of the changes you have made, and you have added all of the new files, you can automatically commit all changes, no need to stage. This is how I normally do things. That looks like:


git commit -a -m "commit message" 

The -a tells git to commit all staged and unstaged changes.

So now you have these commits in git but they have not been pushed to subversion yet. You will need to get this commit into master first. You need to checkout the master repo, then merge back with the new feature.


git checkout master
git merge new_feature

It is likely this merge will work without any conflicts, but if not you will need to fix the conflicts then commit.

Once you have the commit back in the master repo, you will need to resync the master branch to the svn repo to make sure you don’t commit conflicts.


git svn rebase

This will rebase the master branch to the subversion trunk. Next, you need to push the commit to subversion.


git svn dcommit

That’s it! That is the basic circle between an initial checkout back to a commit. I will be going through the different git commands in the next few weeks to go over how they work in more detail. Here are the things I am planning on covering:

  • git rebase
  • git reset
  • git log
  • git stash
  • git merge
  • git mergetool

Did I miss anything major? Let me know how you use git with svn in the comments.

Read: Git SVN Workflow

Topic: IronRuby IDE - The Visual Form Designer Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Sapphire

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use