Bruce Eckel
Posts: 875
Nickname: beckel
Registered: Jun, 2003
|
|
Re: Audio Interview
|
Posted: Jan 9, 2006 11:54 AM
|
|
Yes, I was not so clear as I could have been about that, because I was thinking about the book. I should probably have said something like "not changed it so much that it would require a rewrite," because that's how I was thinking.
It's not surprising that they're considering adding some kind of XML support syntax, because that's what C# is doing (or has done, I haven't been paying attention). So I suppose we could say that Java may continue to add features to try to keep up with C#. Of course, this could mean that they might back off on the longstanding "operator overloading is bad" mantra (although I'll believe that when I see it), in which case I would have to rewrite the book.
Otherwise, I'm thinking that supplements might do the trick for future versions of Java.
I think I heard that C#3.0 is adding some kind of direct database support, so we might see that in Java as well. This would be interesting because it might slow the stampede to rails-like frameworks, but it might also impact EJB3 in a negative fashion -- if we're mostly doing databases, and it's easy to do in the language, we have less of a need for an external framework.
It will be interesting to see how it pans out.
|
|