|
Re: What if Constant Values were also valid Types?
|
Posted: Jan 19, 2006 11:11 AM
|
|
> > Yes. It's a bit like this blog: We have the answer, but > > not the question (what it's for). ;) > > I am throwing the idea out mostly as a tease and to see > where other people go with it.
*g* I don't know if you understood my reference, but unless it's a striking coincidence that you used that number, 42 is a well-known number to "Hitchhiker"-fans. It's "the answer to Life, the Universe and Everything". The problem is coming up with the question... :)
> Personally, I find the idea useful in the context template > metaprogramming.
Myself, I have difficulty understand what the idea is about, given that you haven't specified at all what instances of these "value types" would be like, i.e. what you may do with them.
Incidentally, "value types" is a well-known and useful concept, but it's something rather different to this... :)
|
|