The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Weblogs Forum
Layers, Levels, and DIP

17 replies on 2 pages. Most recent reply: Aug 2, 2008 1:20 AM by john smith

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 17 replies on 2 pages [ « | 1 2 ]
Brad Appleton

Posts: 3
Nickname: bradapp
Registered: Mar, 2003

Re: Layers, Levels, and DIP Posted: Mar 8, 2004 9:33 AM
Reply to this message Reply
In this example from Domain-Driven Design, my impression was that the "layers" the author refers to arent levels of abstraction, but levels of visibility/awareness to the end-user. And the "level" is the depth/degree to which something is exposed or hidden to the user or operator.

In DIP, the level of abstraction refers to levels of knowledge and interdependency of software entities (e.g., objects) upon other software entities.

So "level of abstraction" (as DIP uses the term "level") doesnt help us determine which objects are domain objects and which ones arent. But "layer of application" (as DDD uses the term) does tell us something about which objects are "closer" to the problem domain and which are closer to the solution/implementation domain.

The difference between level of abstraction and layer of application, to me, is that:

* Layer of Application pertains to knowledge about parts of the system that are apparent to its external user;

* Level of Abstraction pertains to knowledge about parts of the system that are apparent to other parts of the system.

Kelley Harris

Posts: 8
Nickname: kelley
Registered: Aug, 2004

Re: Layers, Levels, and DIP Posted: Aug 1, 2004 4:56 PM
Reply to this message Reply
How does Dependency Inversion work in component-based systems? If there are multiple components that are clients of a server component, does each client define an interface that the server multiply inherits? Is it possible to package the server for reuse independent of its clients, and still isolate clients from changes to the server? Via Adapters? Who owns/specifies the adapters? (I'm working in a legacy app w/ one million lines of C++. We're trying to migrate it to a component-based layered architecture, using a Service-Oriented Architecture infrastructure. There appear to be opportunities for DIP.)

john smith

Posts: 1
Nickname: johnsmith5
Registered: Aug, 2008

Re: Layers, Levels, and DIP Posted: Aug 2, 2008 1:20 AM
Reply to this message Reply
Bob then reports that "DDD also says that 'higher' layers should depend on 'lower' layers. Indeed, he stresses that when lower layers need to communicate upwards they should use callbacks or Observers. DDD is not the only source for this concept; it's pretty universal." But what is meant by higher and lower? Martin explains that the Dependency Inversion Principle essentially means " that high level policy should not depend on low level detail. Yet the layering principle says that high level layers should depend upon low level layers


Flat View: This topic has 17 replies on 2 pages [ « | 1  2 ]
Topic: Layers, Levels, and DIP Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Object Adapter based on Dynamic Proxy

Sponsored Links


Copyright © 1996-2018 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use