The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Java Buzz Forum
MS and Novell:Mono Sent Packing?

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Fred Grott

Posts: 4361
Nickname: shareme
Registered: Jan, 2003

Fred Grott is Lead Developer-CEO of ShareMe Technologies LLC -The Mobile Future
MS and Novell:Mono Sent Packing? Posted: Nov 10, 2006 6:23 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz by Fred Grott.
Original Post: MS and Novell:Mono Sent Packing?
Feed Title: ShareMe Technologies LLC-The Mobile Future
Feed URL: http://www.jroller.com/shareme/feed/entries/rss
Feed Description: A Weblog about Java programming and digital convergence on mobile devices in such areas as P2P and collaborative technology.
Latest Java Buzz Posts
Latest Java Buzz Posts by Fred Grott
Latest Posts From ShareMe Technologies LLC-The Mobile Future

Advertisement
The analysis from GrokLaw is missing something. The had to be a logical reason why MS choose to deal with Novell not just blind faith. Remember, folks Novell is not the Linux OS leader and not even 2nd place lead.

Microsoft's patent library on MS.NET technology is quite large. In fact, may be larger than any group of patents Microsoft has on OS technology. We have a slight confirmation from this blog that Mono was included in the patent truce.

Mono is a triple license entity; LGPL, GPL, and closed license according to this FAQ. Okay now we get into NEt architecture.

There is a specific grant on EMCA technology components in MS.NET( ie not higher level ADO.NET, windows forms, and etc) that anyone can implement free of charge. Basically, it means that the Mono got a patent permission form Ms to implement higher level MS.NET stuff the same way as Microsoft.

The twist now is that those who contributed either LGPL or GPL now are somewhat prevented from directly contributing if they are outside of Novell. Why? Because they cannot risk that MS and Novell patent agreement contaminating other FOSS projects that they might contribute to at this time.

But how can it be contaminating? The patent truce terms only apply to original code author. Now I have not seen the exceptions yet but want to bet that one of those exceptions is so designed that no derivate code author receives the same exact no patent suit pledge from MS?

My prediction is that you will see at first both FSF and GNU refuse to contaminate their DotGNU code base with anything from Mono. Than you will see developer migrations from the Mono project and SUSE to other competing projects. I feel sorry for botht he Mono and SUSE developers.

Read: MS and Novell:Mono Sent Packing?

Topic: PeopleOverProcess.com: links for 2006-11-07 Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: AllConsuming.net: Review of Implementing Lean Software Development: From Concept to Cash (The...

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use