The Artima Developer Community
Articles | News | Weblogs | Books | Forums
Artima Forums | Articles | Weblogs | Java Answers | News
Sponsored Link •

Java Buzz Forum
A Question for Ballmer of Microsoft

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Fred Grott

Posts: 4361
Nickname: shareme
Registered: Jan, 2003

Fred Grott is Lead Developer-CEO of ShareMe Technologies LLC -The Mobile Future
A Question for Ballmer of Microsoft Posted: Nov 21, 2006 8:03 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz by Fred Grott.
Original Post: A Question for Ballmer of Microsoft
Feed Title: ShareMe Technologies LLC-The Mobile Future
Feed URL: http://www.jroller.com/shareme/feed/entries/rss
Feed Description: A Weblog about Java programming and digital convergence on mobile devices in such areas as P2P and collaborative technology. 		Latest Java Buzz Posts
Latest Java Buzz Posts by Fred Grott
Latest Posts From ShareMe Technologies LLC-The Mobile Future

Advertisement
In Hotmail's past Linux OS and serves were used right around and or before the winNT 3/4 launch. Yes later hotmail servers were changed to windowsNT. In fact there was even an MS page showing the first few years of hotmail as an MS product/service.

My question Mr Ballmer is when during the transition of hotmail from Linux servers to windows servers did you find evidence of Linux infringing on MS IP and if so why no disclosure of specificity to this late date of 2006? You will notice that TSCOG claims of ignorance of the law did not work in court did you not?

Mr Ballmer please show us poor hobbyists who you view as unprofessional your professional skills in protecting MS's IP by for once and all stating in a professional manner with specificity the exact code lines whereas Linux infringes Microsoft IP.

Certainly you Mr Ballmer charged with the fiduciary responsibility in safeguarding MS IP understand that you have a legal obligation to MS stockholders to follow through with your public statements by showing technical and legal details of Linux code that infringes on MS IP in the proper forum as opposed to public posturing.

In closing I am sure running MS is quite taxing on a daily measure. However, I am sure you will find enough time to get your staff to detail the Linux code that infringes MS IP rights. Surely your fiduciary responsibilities to MS and the stockholders demands that after ten years of public posturing on this exact issue that you finally with immediacy finally detail with specificity the claim in the proper legal forum.

Or did Microsoft miss speak for almost ten years on this issue? Best regards and happy coding Mr Ballmer..

Read: A Question for Ballmer of Microsoft

Topic: Hacking My Cellphone Adapter Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Struts =Cobol, JSF Doubling (Not So Sure)
Sponsored Links


Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use