The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Java Buzz Forum
Really Big Apps (Initial Braindump)

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Brian McCallister

Posts: 1282
Nickname: frums
Registered: Sep, 2003

Brian McCallister is JustaProgrammer who thinks too much.
Really Big Apps (Initial Braindump) Posted: Oct 11, 2007 2:40 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz by Brian McCallister.
Original Post: Really Big Apps (Initial Braindump)
Feed Title: Waste of Time
Feed URL: http://kasparov.skife.org/blog/index.rss
Feed Description: A simple waste of time and weblog experiment
Latest Java Buzz Posts
Latest Java Buzz Posts by Brian McCallister
Latest Posts From Waste of Time

Advertisement

Martin and I had a fantastic discussion earlier today a week or so ago (when I started writing this, holy crap having a two month old on hand stops the blogging) about really big applications. It was fantastic partly because we hashed out some good ideas (which I want to start sharing) but also because it reinforced something Pat Helland has been saying which I strongly agree with: that we lack good language for talking about really big apps.

There has been a bit of a blogging theme going on looking at this. The aforementioned Pat talks about it, Werner Vogels certainly talks a lot about it, the High Scalability Blog has been posting lots of profiles, there was lots of talk around the Seattle Conference on Scalability, and most recently there has been much patter about Amazon's Dynamo.

Once past the operational issues (extremely non-trivial) the scaling bottleneck for big apps generally runs into handling of data. At JavaOne this past summer, Diego specifically narrowed it to handling update rates and I agree in principle, but want to expand it into enough detail to be meaningful. Of the folks with really large, industrial datasets, not many folks realy talk about how they handle it.

Google has done the most talking about how they handle large contiguous datasets -- first with GFS, MapReduce, Sawzall, then BigTable and Chubby. This has lead lots of folks to thinking of the problems in the same terms -- not a bad thing, but not the only way. Hadoop is basically reverse engineering this, and I know of a couple other private implementations modeling the same thing. It is kind of funny, actually. I am super-jazzed to have Amazon talking about different angles on big-data stuff as well :-)

Going to go post this before another week sneaks by. A lot more thoughts but not enough time to brain dump them. Hopefully get a chance soon.

Read: Really Big Apps (Initial Braindump)

Topic: Lego, DSLs and Naked Objects Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Apple iPhone Heading for Class Action Lawsuit?

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use