The Artima Developer Community
Articles | News | Weblogs | Books | Forums
Artima Forums | Articles | Weblogs | Java Answers | News
Sponsored Link •

Java Buzz Forum
Not in cwm, and definitely not in RDF

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Bill de hÓra

Posts: 1137
Nickname: dehora
Registered: May, 2003

Bill de hÓra is a technical architect with Propylon
Not in cwm, and definitely not in RDF Posted: Apr 21, 2004 2:44 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz by Bill de hÓra.
Original Post: Not in cwm, and definitely not in RDF
Feed Title: Bill de hÓra
Feed URL: http://www.dehora.net/journal/atom.xml
Feed Description: FD85 1117 1888 1681 7689 B5DF E696 885C 20D8 21F8 		Latest Java Buzz Posts
Latest Java Buzz Posts by Bill de hÓra
Latest Posts From Bill de hÓra

Advertisement
I do hope folks realize that when RDF goes mainstream, lock-in via rules engines will be the order of the day. Norm Walsh is working out negation: Not in RDF. Go and look at it, the example is cool. But it could have been better titled "Using cwm rules to express not". [Which is not as snappy and I'm such a pedant. But I want to scream every time I see cwm/N3 conflated with RDF.] [beastie boys: sabotage]...

Read: Not in cwm, and definitely not in RDF

Topic: [Apr 14, 2004 05:05 PDT] 13 Links Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Better markup for Javablogs graphs
Sponsored Links


Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use