The Artima Developer Community
Articles | News | Weblogs | Books | Forums
Artima Forums | Articles | Weblogs | Java Answers | News
Sponsored Link •

Java Buzz Forum
Why extending Struts? Why not simply use WW2?

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Lars Hoss

Posts: 21
Nickname: woeye
Registered: Jul, 2003

Lars Hoss is a programmer focusing on J2EE and Objective-C on MacOS X
Why extending Struts? Why not simply use WW2? Posted: Jul 7, 2003 2:32 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz by Lars Hoss.
Original Post: Why extending Struts? Why not simply use WW2?
Feed Title: WoEyE's weblog
Feed URL: http://woeye.highteq.net/xml/weblog/woeye.rss
Feed Description: The personal weblog of WoEyE. Mostly about J2EE and MacOS X. 		Latest Java Buzz Posts
Latest Java Buzz Posts by Lars Hoss
Latest Posts From WoEyE's weblog

Advertisement
Some people might wonder why I worked on IoC and interceptor support for Struts. Though I really like WW2 for it is very well designed it is sometimes not possible for me to use WW2 in production enviroments. Decision makers are seldom interesseted in "technical well designed" but rather in "well known". Struts is nowadays a well known framework. Even IBM has a hole chapter about Struts in one of its WebSphere 4.0 RedBooks. But I really hope that WW2 gets more publicity so that it is easier for me to convince those decision makers :-)

Read: Why extending Struts? Why not simply use WW2?

Topic: The Importance of Dogfood Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: REST vs. SOAP
Sponsored Links


Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use