This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Python Buzz
by Andrew Dalke.
Original Post: Lausanne Cheminformatics workshop and contest
Feed Title: Andrew Dalke's writings
Feed URL: http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/diary/diary-rss.xml
Feed Description: Writings from the software side of bioinformatics and chemical informatics, with a heaping of Python thrown in for good measure.
Dietrich Rordorf from MDPI sent an announcement
to the CHMINF mailing list about the upcoming 9th
Workshop in Chemical Information. It will be on 12 September 2014
in Lausanne, Switzerland. It seems like it will be a nice meeting, so
I thought to forward information about it here. They also have a
software contest, with a 2,000 CHF prize, which I think will interest
some of my readers.
The workshop has been around for 10 years, so I was a bit suprised
that I hadn't heard of it before. Typically between 30 and 50 people
attend, which I think is a nice size. The preliminary program is
structured around 20 minute presentations, including:
Peter Ertl - Database of bioactive ring systems with calculated properties and its use in bioisosteric design and scaffold hopping
Michaël Zasso - Slice based electronic laboratory notebook
Dragos Horvath - Chemigenomics - is it more than inductive transfer?
Guillaume Godin - GC/MS identification in a Browser
Modest Korff - Sub-pharmacophore models as seeds in drug discovery
Jean-Louis Reymond - Interactive tools for visualisation and virtual screening of large compound databases
Michael J E Sternberg - INDDEx - logic-based ligand screening for scaffold hopping
Thomas Sander - 2D scaling with rubber bands and descriptors
If you know the authors, you might recognize that one is from
Strasbourg and another London, and the rest from Switzerland. I can
understand. From where I live in Sweden it will cost over US $300 in
order to get there, and Lausanne doesn't have its own commercial
airport so I would need to fly into Geneva or Bern, while my local air
hub doesn't fly there directly.
But I live in a corner of Europe, and my constraints aren't yours.
Source code contest
I had an email conversation with Luc Patiny about an interesting
aspect of the workshop. They are running a contest
to identify the best open source cheminformatics tool of the year,
with a prize of 2000 CHF. That's 1650 EUR, 2200 USD, 1300 GBP, or
15000 SEK, which is plenty enough for someone in Europe or even the US
to be able to travel there! They have a time slot set aside for the
winner of the contest to present the work. The main requirement is
that contest participants are selected from submissions (1-2 pages
long) to the open access journal Challenges. (And
no, there are no journal page fees for this contest, so it doesn't
seem like a sneaky revenue generating trick.)
The other requirement is that the submission be "open source". I put
that in quotes because much of my conversation with Luc was to
understand what they mean. They want people to be able to download the
(unobsfucated) software source code for no cost and be able to read
and review it to gain insight.
I think this is very much in line with classical peer review thought,
even though it can include software which are neither open source nor free
software. For example, software submissions for this contest could
be "for research purposes only" or "not for use in nuclear reactors",
or "redistributions of modified versions are not permitted."
Instead, I think their definition is more in line with Microsoft terms shared source.
In my case, my latest version of chemfp is 'commercial open source',
meaning that those who pay me money for it get a copy of it under the
MIT open source license. It's both "free software" and "open source",
but it's not eligible for this workshop because it costs money to
download it.
But I live in a corner of open source, and my constraints aren't
yours. ;) If you have a free software project, open source
software project, or shared source software project, then you might be
interested in submitting it to this workshop and journal. If you win,
think of it as an all-expenses paid trip to Switzerland. If you don't
win, think of it as a free publication.