The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Ruby Buzz Forum
The Big Rewrite

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Chad Fowler

Posts: 408
Nickname: chadfowler
Registered: Apr, 2003

A programmer, musician, and language addict.
The Big Rewrite Posted: Dec 27, 2006 12:25 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz by Chad Fowler.
Original Post: The Big Rewrite
Feed Title: ChadFowler.com
Feed URL: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/Chadfowlercom
Feed Description: Best practices, worst practices, and some generally obvious stuff about programming.
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Chad Fowler
Latest Posts From ChadFowler.com

Advertisement
  This is the first in a series of articles, discussing why
  many software rewrite projects end badly and what
  to do to avoid some of the ways I've seen them go astray.
You’ve got an existing, successful software product. You’ve hit the ceiling on extensibility and maintainability. Your project platform is inflexible, and your application is a software house of cards that can’t support another new feature.

You’ve seen the videos, the weblog posts and the hype, and you’ve decided you’re going to re-implement your product in Rails (or Java, or .NET, or Erlang, etc.).

Beware. This is a longer, harder, more failure-prone path than you expect.

Throughout my career in software development, I’ve been involved in Big Rewrite after Big Rewrite. I suspect it’s because I have an interest in learning eclectic computer languages, operating systems, and development environments. Not being just-a-Java-guy or just-a-Windows-guy has led to me becoming a serial rewriter. I’ve been on projects to replace C, COBOL, PHP, Visual Basic, Perl, PLSQL, VBX (don’t ask!) and all manner of architectural atrocities with the latest and greatest technology of the day.

In many cases, these Big Rewrite projects have resulted in unhappy customers, political battles, missed deadlines, and sometimes complete failure to deliver. In all cases, the projects were considerably harder than the projects’ initiators ever thought they would be.

This is not a technology problem. It’s not at all Rails-specific, but being in the limelight these days, Rails implementations are both very likely to happen and very risky right now.

Why So Hard?

So, why, in software rewrites, when you’re traversing exclusively familiar territory are the results so often unpredictable and negative?

For the next week, I’ll post specific reasons I’ve seen things go wrong. The following is a list which will eventually be made into links:

  • Software as Spec
  • Invention or Implementation?
  • The Wish List
  • The Big Bang
  • Justification and Lies
  • Who’s Tending the Store?

Stay tuned.

Read: The Big Rewrite

Topic: Tears in Heaven Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Deploying a Ruby on Rails application in GlassFish

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use