The Artima Developer Community
Articles | News | Weblogs | Books | Forums
Artima Forums | Articles | Weblogs | Java Answers | News
Sponsored Link •

.NET Buzz Forum
Paint.NET 3.0 benchmarked: Dual vs. Quad vs. Eight cores

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Max Zone

Posts: 9170
Nickname: dzone
Registered: Jun, 2006

dzone.com is a link-sharing community where member participation determines what gets published
Paint.NET 3.0 benchmarked: Dual vs. Quad vs. Eight cores Posted: Mar 17, 2007 3:45 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with .NET Buzz by Max Zone.
Original Post: Paint.NET 3.0 benchmarked: Dual vs. Quad vs. Eight cores
Feed Title: dzone.com: .net
Feed URL: http://www.dzone.com/feed/frontpage/.net/rss.xml
Feed Description: dzone.com: fresh .net links for developers 		Latest .NET Buzz Posts
Latest .NET Buzz Posts by Max Zone
Latest Posts From dzone.com: .net

Advertisement
Almost a month ago, Paint.NET v3.0 was released. The download rates are through the roof and the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive. I also released an updated version of PdnBench, which is a command-line utility that benchmarks various parts of Paint.NET's rendering code. Back when Intel released their Core 2 Duo, I published benchmark results comparing it to the Athlon X2 -- including some rather interesting 32-bit vs. 64-bit results.

Read: Paint.NET 3.0 benchmarked: Dual vs. Quad vs. Eight cores

Topic: An evening with James Gosling Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Codus v1.4.0 Beta 031307 Released
Sponsored Links


Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use