The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

.NET Buzz Forum
Fowler: Mocks Aren't Stubs

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Sam Gentile

Posts: 1605
Nickname: managedcod
Registered: Sep, 2003

Sam Gentile is a Microsoft .NET Consultant who has been working with .NET since the earliest
Fowler: Mocks Aren't Stubs Posted: Jul 8, 2004 12:46 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with .NET Buzz by Sam Gentile.
Original Post: Fowler: Mocks Aren't Stubs
Feed Title: Sam Gentile's Blog
Feed URL: http://samgentile.com/blog/Rss.aspx
Feed Description: .NET and Software Development from an experienced perspective - .NET/CLR, Rotor, Interop, MC+/C++, COM+, ES, Mac OS X, Extreme Programming and More!
Latest .NET Buzz Posts
Latest .NET Buzz Posts by Sam Gentile
Latest Posts From Sam Gentile's Blog

Advertisement
The term 'Mock Objects' has become a popular one to describe special case objects that mimic real objects for testing. However the term mock was not originally meant as a more catchy name for stub, but to introduce a different approach to unit testing. In this article I dig into this difference of style to explain the difference between the interaction-based testing style favored by mock object fans, and the more usual state-based testing style.

Read on...

Read: Fowler: Mocks Aren't Stubs

Topic: Microsoft Technical Roadshow 2004 - slides and webcasts Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: [dScribe] Screenshot

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use