This post originated from an RSS feed registered with .NET Buzz
by Scott Hanselman.
Original Post: A Hanselman Review: Doom 3 vs. FarCry vs. Half-Life 2 vs. Halo 2
Feed Title: Scott Hanselman's ComputerZen.com
Feed URL: http://radio-weblogs.com/0106747/rss.xml
Feed Description: Scott Hanselman's ComputerZen.com is a .NET/WebServices/XML Weblog. I offer details of obscurities (internals of ASP.NET, WebServices, XML, etc) and best practices from real world scenarios.
Believe it or not, I'm not a big gamer. By 'not a big gamer' I mean, I didn't
take a week off work to play GTA:
San Andreas as a co-worker did. By 'not a big gamer' I mean, I lost interest
with Ninja Gaiden because
it was too freaking hard. I've got about 2 hours patience with a game, but I stop
when I start to hurt, be it hands, back or head.
That said, you'd think I was a gamer as in the last two months I've
picked up Doom 3, FarCry, Half-Life
2, and Halo 2.
These games, unquestionably, represent the pinnacle - thus far - of FPS-style
gaming. The first three are PC while Halo 2 is on XBox. I'm playing the PC games on
a P4-4Ghz with a gig of Ram and an ATI Radeon 9600 Pro.
There's been a million reviews of all these games from AnandTech-type
reviews that tell you how much internal processor cache you must have to
enjoy these games, to TomsHardware-type reviews
that are meant to sell $500 video cards with heat sinks and fans of their own, to
12-year old blogger/reviewers who let you know about the latest mods and cheats so
they can embarrass my 30-year old ass on multi-player maps. (You'll be happy to hear
that I (and my ego) no longer need to defeat these infidels to feel
secure. I just cry tiny tears and leave it at that.)
That said, I wanted to write up what I thought was important
about these games, and what drives my opinion and buying decisions around gaming.
These categories may be slightly different than the typical review. Or not.
While Doom 3 tries harder than it's predecessors, there's little story to speak of.
Some crazy stuff happens on Mars and you're a Mars Marine who has to single-handedly
kill everyone. There are some interactions with other characters but it's largely
as you stumble upon them doing something else, and you can't assist them. They are
usually killed as you walk away. The "scripting" feels a little stilted to me. There
are a few clever places where the camera backs out of your first-person view into
a third person view when you "trigger" an event. Perhaps a monster is making in entrance.
Then the camera pushes in to the back of your head and control returns to you to take
care of business. It's fairly predictable as you can "feel" when it should happen.
You'll notice a pattern here as "single-handedly" is pretty common in the FPS space.
In FarCry, you're on vacation when your wife is kidnapped and you are unwittingly
and unwillingly pulled into a terrorist plot to do some crazy stuff. You have to single-handedly
kill everyone. Every once in a while, a benefactor in the form of a scientist
on the project meets up with you to help out.
The original Half-Life set a whole new level for story quality and I believe Half-Life 2
is even more extraordinary. There is constant interaction with the NPCs and a real
sense of total immersion that I honestly haven't felt since "Bard's Tale." There's
many places where you find your self asking "what's the story here? There's something
I'm not seeing or being told." That sense of curiosity continues to push you forward
through the narrative. It's also worth noting that the realism in the faces and expressions
of the characters is truly amazing and really underscores the uniqueness of people.
Rather than dozens of carbon copy NPCs, each character is totally unique and could
be recognized in a crowd later. "Oh! It's this guy again" happens a lot. Additionally
since the "action button" doubles as the pick-stuff-up-and-optionally-throw-it button,
there are a number of things you can do to interact with the environment. I'd
say that Half-Life 2 has the most interactive world of any game I've played. You can
blow up anything, stack objects, throw objects, flip over tables and hide behind them,
toss TVs out windows, and break things with your crowbar. I was impressed with
the attention to detail yesterday when I broke a window with the crowbar, expecting
the whole window to break out, and instead, as it was safety glass, the window shatter,
but stayed together, and I had to clear it out with additionally specifically-placed
blows. This level of detail means that things in Half-Life 2 work as they should (as
they do in the real world) so rather than learning the physics of the Half-Life world,
you can use your knowledge of the real world in this artificial one. This increases
the overall enjoyment of the game greatly.
Halo 2's single player story is even more compelling than the others as there are
extensive movie-like cut scenes of some length that explain the context of the larger
story. Additionally you will end up playing as more than one character later
in the game which deepens your involvement and causes you to wonder who are the
good guys and who are the bad guys, and gives the game less of an "us vs. them" narrative
and more of a "us vs. them and them vs. three or four other folks."
Most of the puzzles in Doom 3 are pretty stock and fairly lame. Find this key from
that guy's body. Open that door. Find this code from this guys personal log. Open
that door. Only once (so far) is there a "move this barrel" puzzle and then it's just
to throw them in the trash. Mostly it's just shoot folks. There's not a lot of platform
jumping, just moving from door to door, ammo cache to ammo cache. The puzzle aspect
of killing is limited. Mostly zombies lunge and beasts run at you. There's no puzzle-strategy
on how to kill them - circle-strafe, rinse, repeat. Doom 3 has great object physics,
but not nearly enough objects available to show it all. When you go to Hell later
in the game, it's just red-red-red and there's even less to interact with.
FarCry is also not big on puzzles. There are a number of doors to open and forts to
blow up. This is a much more tactical game - the "puzzle" factor is more "how do I
kill as many of them before they realize there's just one of me." Sound (your footsteps)
and light (your shadow) play a big part as you try to take out entire enclaves with
limited ammo. The FarCry enemy AI is also top-notch and the best of the four games.
The enemies will call for help, run away, panic, berzerk, hide, sneak and more. This
makes you feel like you're fighting another intelligence. The physics model is without
par, but none of the puzzles use it. There are a number of single-player downloadable
maps that are specifically designed to show off the physics by causing
things like chain-reaction blowing up of barrels, but I wish that kind of stuff
was in the game more.
The puzzles in Half-Life 2 are a freakin' blast. Most are physics-based which
is great considering that I dig physics, and the physics engine within the game is
fantastic. You'll find creative ways to raise water levels, set up ramps, remember
that different objects have decidedly different weight, including your own body. There
are gravity puzzles, water puzzles, 'how do I get up there' puzzles. Additionally
you are, more often than not, presented with more than one way to solve the puzzle,
but often only one solution is possible. Afterwards you'll find yourself saying, "oh,
I can totally see where I took a wrong turn on that one."
Halo 2 is a little weak on puzzles. Again, it's more tactical. Some fights you can
bow out of by letting the fighting factions beat themselves up. Each enemy has a weakness
or weapon they are the most vulnerable to, so there's a lot of rock-paper-scissors
choosing of weapons. Most puzzles involve killing something then finding a button
to open a door or move an object. Since your own interaction with the world is the
"action" button, and that button can only "do stuff," you can only perform actions
that an object is scripted to know.
The vehicles in FarCry
are wide ranging, from a blow-up boat, to a hang-glider, to buggies and jeeps. There
are number of times when you have to make smart use of a vehicle or its weaponry to
solve a task. FarCry and Halo 2 are just about equal when it comes to coolness of
vehicles, but Halo 2 gets the nod for including "jacking" of vehicles.
The "water hazard" sequence in Half-Life 2 is bar-none the most extraordinary experience
I've ever had playing a single player FPS. It alone makes the game worth the price.
Half-Life's vehicle use is great, and the immense size of the vehicles and beasts
that the enemy uses is also awe-inspiring, especially the Striders.
Halo 2 improves on Halo's use of vehicles which was already outstanding. Halo 2 adds
the ability to "jack" a vehicle. With good timing you can jump onto an enemy vehicle
and yank the driver out, throwing them from the cockpit. You then take over driving
and, well, kill them all. There are also some immense non-drivable vehicles that
you have to jump on top off from a bridge and destroy from the inside. Also, the vehicle
sizes far greatly from tanks to small "ghosts" which dramatically changes the feel
of the game during these sequences. The tank sequences are especially powerful and
satisfying.
Touted as the graphics to end all graphics, Doom 3 is pretty snazzy. However,
it's dark. Frankly I found myself thinking "are the graphics really all that good
or are they justing being smart with shadows." The objects are gorgeous, as are the
player models, and the use of light (what light there is) is a amazing. Everything
casts a realistic shadow and the reflections and use of glass is amazing. It's just
so damn dark. Additionally, the graphics are repetitive. When you've see one lonely
Mars base level you've seen them all. OK, I get it. Doesn't the Sun come out on Mars?
FYI: I play Doom 3 at 1280x1024x32 with 2x Anti-AliASINg. [Example
Image]
I play FarCry at 1600x1200x32 with no Anti-AliASINg and it's amazing. The FarCry environment
is largely outside on a tropical island. The organic aspect of the island is well represented
with their graphics engine, with the grass and trees standing out particularly
well. The use of wind and sound along with swaying grass and foliage is strong
in the jungle scenes. However, when you start your way into the caves and start fighting
monsters, it gets too dark and too much like Doom 3. Frankly, I played FarCry
religiously for days until I got to the dark monster stuff, and just got
disinterested. I'd go back and play the game from the start up through, and until,
the monster levels. Make sure your resolution is as high as your card will support,
it's worth losing a few frames a second to get a glimpse at the incredibly long draw-depth.
FarCry boasts a draw-depth (the distances at which objects in the environment aren't
rendered anymore) as much as a full kilometer. The levels in FarCry are MASSIVE -
as much as 4 kilometers square. The engine really shines when you are at the top of
the island with a sniper rifle. The binoculars are a thrill to use to spy on the enemy
at long distances. [Example
Image]
Half-Life 2 blew me away. As much as Doom 3 floored me, Half-Life 2 crushed
Doom 3. Argue polygons and detail and lighting and whatever all you want, but when
Half-Life 2 renders an entire living city-scape with clotheslines and giant propaganda-filled
TV overloading city squares, and waterways filled with floating plastic bottles (that
you can interact with) the 10x10 corridors and mazes that Doom 3 has me running around
in just can't compete. Additionally the face
and character modeling is without par. Half-Life 2 has restored my faith in PC
gaming. [Example
Image]
The Halo graphics engine has been completely re-written between Halo
1 and Halo 2. It appears to be a progressive rendering image that drops textures and
polygon count when frame rate might suffer. For example, when a level loads,
it loads immediately, but you can see far-away textures load last and cover over low-res
images and low polygon count buildings. You can still move around during these times,
and it rarely lasts more than second, but I thought it was of note. Additionally as
you move away from, say a dead body on the ground that is not longer of interest,
there is a "popout" (my word) effect as the game dramatically and quickly lowers the
polygon count (or swaps the model) for that entity, presumably to open up processing
power for more important objects. I personally find this effect distracting and obvious,
but no one else I've mentioned it to seems to care. During a slow moment, look
at any object and walk slowly towards it and then away from it as far as you can.
You'll be able to count at least THREE, possibly FOUR separate models or "steps" that
the object will go through. Again, I'm assuming that since the XBox is nearly
three-year-old technology running an NVidia
nForce derived card that this software technique opened up processing
headroom for normal mapping. To be clear, the graphics in Halo 2 are the greatest
graphics I've ever seen from a console, and certainly make standard TV shine. (Halo
2 also shines at 480p on a HDTV but 480 horizontal lines is the max, and equivalent
to 640x480 or 720x480 resolution) However, it can't compete with a 19" LCD at 1600x1200
running Half-Life 2. [Example
Image]
I found the level design in Doom 3 to be fairly pedestrian. I mean pedestrian in both
meanings. It's combines the excitement (not) of overly-symmetrical design with
the thrill (not) of constantly being on-foot, not to mention having to back-track
to retrieve keys and widgets you may have missed. The levels tend to be named Alpha
Lab 1, which isn't a bad name until you've been playing for hours and the next level
is Alpha Lab 7. OK, I get it. Can I get to the freakin' Beta lab? Ah, steel walls
with no lights. We've made it to Mars, but didn't bring backup batteries? Flares?
A friggin' glowstick? But, I digress. Every once in a while you get to leave the lab
for the Martian landscape, but you consistently don't bring an air pack or helmet
so you only get to enjoy the scenery for 20 seconds before your brain explodes. You
have to run as fast as you can to the other airlock. Again, we knew we were coming
to Mars. Perhaps a breezeway would have been a nice architectural touch? Just a though.
Levels in FarCry are many and varied. The game is huge, and while most of it happens
on a remote tropical island, the design makes good use of caves, mountain trails,
forts, underwater and boat approaches, as well as the best level that includes
a giant abandoned tanker (I thought this level was reminiscent of The Goonies. Go
figure.) culminating in a huge fire-fight on the top that includes helicopters and
guys on turrets. And me with a single Uzi. That was a tough one. As you move
deeper there are levels in underground caves, high in the trees (ala Ewok village)
and reinforced concrete forts. If it wasn't for those darn monsters, I would have
loved it all the way through. I just don't feel the need to put genetically-modified
mutant creatures in every single game.
That said, Half-Life 2 is all about mutant creatures (from another dimension?) but
the Level Design is perfect. You have to think though, when moving around these levels.
While the gameplay is pretty linear, there are many
back roads and alleys that should be explored, not only get to useful plot
points, but to avoid running out of health. There's little backtracking, but when
there is, you'll often find different things and people when you return to a previous
location. I got nailed a couple of times assuming that I'd cleared an area, when of
course, in a realistic simulation, the cops would come to check out the commotion
and might be waiting for my return. There is an uncomfortable break in the action
as you move from level to level. It presents itself as a mandatory pause with a -loading-
sign. After 20 seconds the game continues. I wish they'd have been loading these levels
in a background thread as Halo 2 does. Otherwise, Half-Life 2 is the closest thing
I've experienced to total immersion in a game. You are truly "playing a movie." I
feel that the total lack of cut-scenes increases this sense of immersion. Instead
the scripted encounters take the place of cut-scenes and you always have control over
your character's movement.>
>
Halo 2 level design is, as usual, stunning. It's a little two symmetrical and repetitive,
IMHO, when you encounter the Covenant and enter their domain. However, the early city
levels are massive. Another important note about levels - in Halo 2 there isn't the
sense of a distinct "level," as there are "scenes." There is no loading pause to speak
of as you move from location to location. You'd think at this level of the development
of games as a media, the publishers would realize that we don't like waiting for levels
to load. If you know the game is linear, then you know what the next level is. For
Pete's sake, preload it as I'm moving towards it! It's not like I'm moving towards
another level. Halo 2 takes this Common Sense to heart and gives you a completely
seamless experience.
Doom 3 only supports up to 4 players at a time to play multiplayer. In my mind,
this is hardly multiplayer. If I want to play an FPS with strangers, I'd rather it
be a free-for-all 16 player war than just 3 other schleps. There are hacks
and mods to allow for more players, but this was a surprising message for ID
to be sending the public about their flagship product. Doom 3 is clearly
meant to be a single player game.
FarCry has a very active multiplayer map community and there are literally scores
of maps available. The interface is slightly less friendly than Counter-Strike, and
certainly not as flexible as Halo 2, but still a strong multi-player contender, and
the winner for massively-sized maps.
Half-Life 2 is officially a single player game. It does ship with multiplayer maps,
but as has been the tradition since Counter-Strike (a total conversion Half-Life 1
mod), the engine is meant to be reused for multiplayer. That said, when you buy Half-Life
2 via Steam, you get the full version of Counter-Strike: Source, which is newer port
of the anti-terrorist classic Counter-Strike using the new "Source" Graphics Engine
used in Half-Life 2. This game is a blast and includes lots of maps, weapons and VoIP
trash talking.
Halo 2 along with XBox Live redefines ease-of-use with its multiplayer. There are
Parties, Clans, Rumbles, Giant Fights, Little Fights and in-between. You can use any
of their dozen included game variants with complete control over allowed weapons,
rules, etc. You can also create named-variants of your own games. Every single game
played is stored and can be accessed via Bungie.Net or RSS Feeds. Additionally, everyone
who has XBox Live has an XBox Communicator Microphone and broadband (required) so
the sense of multi-player community is heightened by both proximity-based communication
(whoever is nearby can hear you) and push-to-talk walkie-talkie communication (press
a button and talk through your helmet to your team). The XBox has really improved
multiplayer gaming with the inclusion of microphones in a way that is possible, but
still a hassle, on the PC.
There's an Update button within Doom 3, but it didn't tell me I needed to update even
though an update was clearly available not sure what's up with that. Additionally,
when I did update, the new update wouldn't allow me to use my own save games from
where they were saved. Instead I had to start that level over from the beginning.
I'm sure there was a technical reason why this had to happen, but it was LAME.
FarCry has had some patching troubles with an abortive attempt at a Patch version
1.2 that was yanked the following day (not after I and many others installed it.)
Version 1.3 took months to be released. There's no patch notification service
so I have to poll for patches, and they are installed via InstallShield. Fairly typical,
certainly not revolutionary, and one of the lame things about PC gaming. I also had
to start a level over due to file version incompatibilities.
Half-Life 2 uses a unique game-delivery system called Steam.
I payed $70 and received not only Half-Life 2, but also the original Half-Life,
Counter Strike:Source, and 10 additional games like Day Of Defeat and Team Fortress.
All delivered over Steam. I can even play them on my laptop just by installing Steam
and logging in. All the patches are automatically installed on startup. Some
folks complain that you have to be online to get your purchase authenticated, but
that hasn't been a problem for me, and I was totally impressed as the multi-gigabyte
Half-Life 2 purchase was slowly pre-loaded onto my machine weeks before the game was
released. The entire purchase and experience was online. No box, no problems. I was
throughly impressed with the process. Steam also checks the version of your Video
Card Driver and points you to the correct download page to get the latest version.
Why doesn't Windows Update open their API to do that for the OEMs?
Surprisingly patching XBox Live is not a seamless as Half-Life 2/Steam. With Steam,
you don't have to do a single thing. With the XBox you are informed there is a required
updated and have to press one button. Considering that I don't have a choice, why
not just install it silently? That said, every update experience (what few there are)
I've had with the Xbox has been butter. You just hit "A" and get on with it. One of
the nice things about Console Gaming, but as has been proven with Steam, a good experience
is equally possible with the PC.
Great graphics, great puzzles, great story, great feel, great experience. Steam rocks
with auto-updates and patching. My favorite and the ultimate FPS PC game so far.
Unparalleled totally seamless multiplayer with up to 16 folks trash talking simultaneously,
a dozen variations, best graphics on a console, no patching, no worries, downloadable
levels and unbelievable
statistical database.
If you want to fight on a tropical island with hundreds of terrorists, this is a winner.
Also has easy multiplayer with massive maps and dozens more to download. Also the
total-conversion mod community is large and we will likely see the next big mod come
from this group for this game.
Only 4 players in multiplayer? Oy. Too dark, too scary, a real disappointment. Amazing
sound, truly, but otherwise I just don't have the patience or stomach for the repetition.
Previous Topic
