The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Agile Buzz Forum
My thoughts about "JSF is way too complicated?"

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Dominik Wei-Fieg

Posts: 60
Nickname: dominikwei
Registered: Aug, 2005

Dominik Wei-Fieg is a software developer living and working in Freiburg, Germany
My thoughts about "JSF is way too complicated?" Posted: Feb 18, 2007 4:51 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by Dominik Wei-Fieg.
Original Post: My thoughts about "JSF is way too complicated?"
Feed Title: Ars Subtilior
Feed URL: http://typo.ars-subtilior.com/articles.rss
Feed Description: Finest Handmade Code Random thoughts about agile software development as an art
Latest Agile Buzz Posts
Latest Agile Buzz Posts by Dominik Wei-Fieg
Latest Posts From Ars Subtilior

Advertisement

Imho, JSF is not too complicated. JSF was conceived for specific goals, and I think that JSF matches these goals very well. When you want to develop a java web application and can follow the path that JSF has laid out for you, you are well served. Integration with IDEs is available, RAD support, drag and drop development, it’s all included in the package. So, yes, JSF is not too complicated, if you use it the way it should be used.

JSF, e. g. , abstracts away the low level request-response layer inherent in all applications delivered over HTTP. I agree with Tim Shadel that the abstraction is leaky, but maybe programmers new to web development have something to gain from this abstraction.

It is only when you leave the troten path, when you make design decisions that were not considered in JSF, that JSF gets complicated. And even then, it is not actually JSF that gets complicated, but the fact that you have to work around a framework which was supposed to help you. It gets complicated because you have to dig through the seven layer burrito down to the request and the response to do what you want to do. Managed beans in request scope and bookmarkable URLs are, in my experience, things that have either not been considered in JSF, have been omitted on purpose or were, to the JSF creators, on the fringe of things considered necessary for a web framework.

I have done web development in Java since about eight years, starting out with Servlets going over JSP to JSF. I have also done web development in Perl, PHP and Python. And I currently do all my off-work projects in rails. Having worked with different frameworks written in different languages, I feel like there is a sweetspot between abstraction and allowing easy access to low level HTTP. And that sweetspot surely isn’t universal. But it seems that I share the same sweetspot with a lot of programmers. For me it’s rails. BUT: that does not mean that I would say that JSF is bad! It is just not a the level of abstraction I would like to work at.

Read: My thoughts about "JSF is way too complicated?"

Topic: The blind leading the stupid Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Why Smalltalk, with Examples

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use