The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Agile Buzz Forum
Nikon D3 vs D300

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Mark Levison

Posts: 877
Nickname: mlevison
Registered: Jan, 2003

Mark Levison an agile software developer who writes Notes from a tool user.
Nikon D3 vs D300 Posted: Oct 12, 2007 2:42 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by Mark Levison.
Original Post: Nikon D3 vs D300
Feed Title: Notes from a Tool User
Feed URL: http://feeds.feedburner.com/NotesFromAToolUser
Feed Description: Thoughts about photography, software development, reading, food, wine and the world around us.
Latest Agile Buzz Posts
Latest Agile Buzz Posts by Mark Levison
Latest Posts From Notes from a Tool User

Advertisement

The announcement of Nikon's two new camera's has really been forcing me to crystallize my thinking around buying a full frame digital camera.

For nearly 15 years I shot with a Nikon F801s (an 8008s for my American friends), it was a solid workhorse of a camera with a good reliable spot meter. About three years ago now I gave up film, sold the 801s and bought a D70. I haven't looked back the D70 has been a great camera - but when I bought it I had my fingers crossed behind my back. I was secretly hoping that Nikon would produce a full frame DSLR for the pro-sumer market. I had such a strong belief in this that I kept my 20-40mm (a useless nearly useless lens on 1.5 crop sensor).

But now that D3 is arriving I forced to question my original desire for a full frame DSLR. I've come to really appreciate the extra reach that my 80-200mm has.

The quandry: If I will eventually buy a full frame DSLR then I shouldn't invest in any DX lenses - but I will need a good midrange zoom (don't have for historical reasons). If I'm going to stick with DX then its time to start thinking about a wide angle and the 18-200 DX/VR.

Key differences:

  D3 (FX or Full Frame sensor) D300 (DX or 2/3's sensor)
Telephoto lenses work at their original length. But to get the greater reach I have to spend real $$$. My 70-300, is an adequate 450mm. My 80-200 (with 2x teleconverter) makes a poor mans 600mm lens.
Wide Angle lenses I will have my wide angles back Hmm will have to part with some cash to get wider than 27mm.
Depth of Field (for equivalent Field of view) Shallower depth of field in any given situation Shallow depth of field harder.
High ISO Bigger sensor, less noise. Definitely great out ISO 1600 Apparently even 6400 is good. The few samples anyone has seen look pretty damn good.
Weight heavy - especially when you weigh all those full size lens.  

 

Unless Nikon has a stunning announcement of a pro-sumer full frame camera in the next 18 mths I will probably just bite the bullet and admit that I'm shooting DX cameras for a long time to come.

If you enjoyed this post, subscribe now to get free updates.

Read: Nikon D3 vs D300

Topic: Travel with Seaside Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Protected variables cause subtle bugs - don't use them

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use