The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Agile Buzz Forum
Why Video?

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
James Robertson

Posts: 29924
Nickname: jarober61
Registered: Jun, 2003

David Buck, Smalltalker at large
Why Video? Posted: Feb 14, 2008 11:20 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by James Robertson.
Original Post: Why Video?
Feed Title: Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants
Feed URL: http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/rssBlog/rssBlogView.xml
Feed Description: James Robertson comments on Cincom Smalltalk, the Smalltalk development community, and IT trends and issues in general.
Latest Agile Buzz Posts
Latest Agile Buzz Posts by James Robertson
Latest Posts From Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants

Advertisement

Mathew Ingram:

I’ve said it before - I just don’t think video is as compelling a medium for discussion as blogs are. Video can start discussions or conversations, and Loren’s vlog is a great example of that, but it doesn’t really lend itself to the back-and-forth that makes blogs so appealing — plus, you can’t search it easily, or scan it quickly the way you can with text.
People keep posting Twitter messages saying “I’m streaming live -- come chat with me!” and yet I never do. Why? Maybe I’m busy, maybe I just don’t feel like it. The point is, no one ever posts on their blog: “Hey, I’m blogging right now -- come comment on my post!” Blogging is asynchronous in that sense, I guess, and that makes its appeal a lot broader, I think.

I think there are a few different problems at work here. First, video requires a level of attention that audio doesn't - I can listen to a podcast as I jog or bike, but I can't watch video as I do either of those activities. For that matter, I can't watch while I drive, either - and while I don't commute, lots of people who do consume podcasts while they drive.

Then there's the "appointment" nature of a live broadcast. There's a radio talk show I tend to like, but I have never actually listened to it on the radio - I'd have to set aside time during the work day in order to do so. However, the 60 minutes of each hour of the show condense down to 33 or so minutes of podcast - just about perfect for my exercise break.

So with something like uStream (et. al.) - I'm back to "must see TV" land. Thanks guys, but my DVR allowed me to escape that a long while back, and I'm not about to revisit via my Mac. Video has its uses - it's great for demonstrations, for instance (ever try to describe the Smalltalk browser with audio-only or just text?). It's just not terribly useful for the "talking heads" variety of content. I always thought about 90% (maybe more) of what Scoble did at PodTech would have worked better as audio only, and much of the vlog work going on now falls into the same bucket.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Read: Why Video?

Topic: The culture war Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Parade of dumb ideas

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use