The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Agile Buzz Forum
Is registers for arguments pluasable?

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
James Robertson

Posts: 29924
Nickname: jarober61
Registered: Jun, 2003

David Buck, Smalltalker at large
Is registers for arguments pluasable? Posted: Jan 8, 2004 9:20 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by James Robertson.
Original Post: Is registers for arguments pluasable?
Feed Title: Michael Lucas-Smith
Feed URL: http://www.michaellucassmith.com/site.atom
Feed Description: Smalltalk and my misinterpretations of life
Latest Agile Buzz Posts
Latest Agile Buzz Posts by James Robertson
Latest Posts From Michael Lucas-Smith

Advertisement

Here's the kicker with respect to calling methods using registers as the arguments. What if we don't have enough registers free for all the arguments? In this scenario, what happens is called 'register spill', where we spill over the available registers for use.

When this occurs, we must create an object to hold the arguments and pass that object as the only argument to the method. Such a method must already know it will take a spill object instead of register parameters.

So is this a practical method? How many registers do we have. So far I've talked about the 'continuation address', the 'stack pointer' and the 'stack allocation pointer'. That's three out of the x86's 8 registers used. If we want to go further, we could have the heap pointer (not an allocation pointer for the heap, this would sit at the start of the heap area). That leaves us with only 4 general purpose registers on the x86 architecture.

There will be other ways to handle the heap registers by putting them at known memory locations. And you can get 'fake' registers by reserving some known memory addresses to be used as registers too, but lets play it out as it is for now and see where it goes.

So to see if three general purpose registers is okay, I ran a quick check over all the method names in the VisualWorks Smalltalk image which also had WithStyle loaded in to it.

Here's the results:

  • No Arguments: 27,896 methods
  • One Argument: 4,057 methods
  • Two Arguments: 1,365 methods
  • Three Arguments: 486 methods
  • Four Arguments: 153 methods
  • Five Arguments: 66 methods
  • Six or more Arguments: 59 methods

I put in italics the methods that would require a spill object. Only 0.37% of methods in the system will spill!. Clearly this indicates that the technique will work even on a system with 8 registers like an x86.

And lets not forget that the alternative to putting arguments in to registers is to put arguments on to the stack like a C program. So we're not too bad off if we have to resort to that technique.

Actually, the sooner we know we have to use that technique in a method, the sooner we know that we will now have 4 registers free for 'whatever' instead of holding arguments to the next call. (There is surprisingly little 'whatever' left in a system like this)

Read: Is registers for arguments pluasable?

Topic: Re: Kids on Piracy Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Expert Customer Service

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use