The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Agile Buzz Forum
Why Scrum Sprints Are Not Mini Waterfall

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Franco Martinig

Posts: 5631
Nickname: martinig
Registered: Apr, 2003

Scrum Expert
Why Scrum Sprints Are Not Mini Waterfall Posted: Feb 7, 2012 2:31 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by Franco Martinig.
Original Post: Why Scrum Sprints Are Not Mini Waterfall
Feed Title: Scrum Expert
Feed URL: http://feeds.feedburner.com/ScrumExpert
Feed Description: Resources, News and Tools for the ScrumMasters, Product Owners and Agile Developers
Latest Agile Buzz Posts
Latest Agile Buzz Posts by Franco Martinig
Latest Posts From Scrum Expert

Advertisement
Companies that transition to Agile often adopt the analogy that sprints are just mini waterfall. This article provides five reasons why Scrum sprints are not mini-Waterfall. Each argument is illustrated by a diagram that provides a clear visual evidence of the difference between the Agile approach and a traditional process. These reasons are:   Continuous design, development, integration, and testing   Cross-functional team members   No change in scope during Sprint   Time boxing   A strictly defined cadence

Read: Why Scrum Sprints Are Not Mini Waterfall

Topic: Thinking Tools for Large-Scale Scrum Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Understanding the Scrum Burndown Chart

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use