This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz
by Martin Fowler.
Original Post: Bliki: PrimingPrimeDirective
Feed Title: Martin Fowler's Bliki
Feed URL: http://martinfowler.com/feed.atom
Feed Description: A cross between a blog and wiki of my partly-formed ideas on software development
Regardless of what we discover, we understand and truly believe
that everyone did the best job they could, given what they knew at
the time, their skills and abilities, the resources available, and
the situation at hand.
The Retrospective Prime Directive is an important part of
retrospective practice, and has been in integral part of
retrospective thinking since Norm Kerth first launched the practice.
Recently I read Pat Kua's
new
Retrospective Handbook, which is based on the extensive experience
with retros that Pat has had as a tech lead at ThoughtWorks. I find Pat's
advice for the Prime Directive revolting, yet have to say he's
almost certainly correct.
His advice is simple:
In my view, every retrospective should start with the Prime
Directive being read out, exactly as it has been worded. I know
some agile teams that regularly run retrospectives and choose to
skip it in favor of delving into the other phases, but in my
experience, this tends to result in less valuable retrospective
outputs.
...
This advice is true for agile teams running heartbeat
retrospectives: start the meeting by reading out the Prime
Directive. Whoever reads it out should do so as enthusiastically
as possible and, even better, leave it hanging in the room to give
participants a visible reminder of the statement’s powerful
potential.
Pat Kua's
handbook is an excellent, short guide to running
retrospectives
This kind of advice generates in me a feeling of deep revulsion.
Immediately it brings to mind images of motivational posters, school
prayers, and two-minutes hate.
Empty rituals, designed to quench curiosity and innovation, presided
over by those whose minds are too empty to share my distaste.
Yet there's significant evidence that a ritual like this can
supply real benefits, supporting Pat's positive experiences. In
psychology there is a phenomenon called priming.
In an experiment that became an instant classic, the
psychologist John Bargh and his collaborators asked students at
New York University—most aged eighteen to twenty-two—to assemble
four-word sentences from a set of five words (for example, “finds
he it yellow instantly”). For one group of students, half the
scrambled sentences contained words associated with the elderly,
such as Florida, forgetful, bald, gray, or wrinkle. When they had
completed that task, the young participants were sent out to do
another experiment in an office down the hall. That short walk was
what the experiment was about. The researchers unobtrusively
measured the time it took people to get from one end of the
corridor to the other. As Bargh had predicted, the young people
who had fashioned a sentence from words with an elderly theme
walked down the hallway significantly more slowly than the
others.
-- Daniel Kahneman
The above quote comes from one of my favorite recent reads,
Daniel Kahneman's Thinking Fast and
Slow. The book focuses on the many ways our mind can be
fooled by jumping to incorrect intuitive conclusions. With priming
what happens is that the mind can be primed into a state that tilts
outcomes. Kahneman also reports experiments which have suggested
that priming with associations of money can lead to increased
self-reliance and selfishness; and "reminding people of their
mortality increases the appeal of authoritarian ideas". A recent
experiment suggested that a simple fifteen
minute writing exercise about personal values could
significantly improved the performance of women in physics
examinations.
Faced with this evidence on the power of priming [1], it seems likely
that focusing attention on the Prime Directive could well be priming
people to take that more open and understanding frame of mind that's
essential for a good retrospective. So however much I hate it, I
should just bite my tongue and put up with it.
1:
There are some question marks over priming. Firstly there is the
point that almost all these modern psychological experiments are
done on students; and it may be that young, affluent, and
intelligent westerners don't react the same as all of humanity.
Secondly there have been concerns about problems with replication
in many of these studies.