|
|
Re: negate of ===?
|
Posted: Aug 20, 2008 7:18 AM
|
|
> Seems useful to me that I don't have to keep typing the
> text where I just want the value to show when it fail the
> test.
>
> When you said keep it simple, adding more methods doesn't
> seem complicated things to me. If user don't use it, it's
> not going to bother right?
>
Well every method I add to the API adds surface area that users have to climb over to find what they are looking for. It adds more to read in the documentation, more to remember when you're using the API, more to try to figure out when looking at someone else's code. So I'd prefer to add the ones that hit the 80/20 rule--especially when it comes to adding operators--and I'm not sure how much !== would actually be used. Can you let me know what kind of use cases you use it for?
Thanks.
Bill
|
|
Previous Topic
