Sean Landis, author of Agile Hiring, discusses why he thinks sloppy résumés should not be tolerated.
Software developers and testers are not writers. Have you ever said this to yourself while reviewing a poorly written résumé? Is it OK to tolerate sloppy résumés? My answer is: Only if you aren’t interested in hiring the best. The résumé is the candidate’s primary selling tool. It establishes the first impression with a prospective employer. So why would an intelligent, thoughtful, quality-conscious person represent herself with a sloppy résumé? The answer is: She wouldn’t!
Our stereotypes urge us to cut software folks some slack. “Developers are anti-social,” “Developers are poor communicators,” “Developers don’t need to communicate as long as they write good code.” Buying into these stereotypes will only lead to bad hiring. Communication, oral and written, ought to be considered core competencies for software developers and testers.
How hard is it to create a quality résumé? There are countless resources on the Internet; placement agencies provide free advice to candidates they represent; other professionals can review and provide feedback; and spell and grammar checkers are ubiquitous. Even if the résumé language is the candidate’s second language, these and other options are still available. There is no excuse.
You might wonder if there is an untold story behind a sloppy résumé. Maybe. What might be the reasons for a sloppy or incomplete résumé?
Be fair about what you deem a sloppy résumé. Keep personal preferences on style and formatting out of your thinking. Focus on bad grammar, misspellings, vagueness, and unintelligibility. A few mistakes are probably tolerable, but a general trend is unacceptable.
I am concerned if a candidate misspells or incorrectly capitalizes technology names. Technology misspellings draw into question just how much experience a candidate has with the technology. One who uses and understands a technology, should encounter the name often enough to be able to spell it correctly.
I take sloppiness seriously. People who are careless communicators, or use poor judgment, are not good hires. Quality is essential in software development. Why would an employer hire someone to shepherd their core software assets who cannot even take the care to do a good job on their own “core assets?”
How do you feel about sloppy developer résumés? Do you feel differently about testers? Managers? Where do you draw the line when it comes to sloppiness? Please share your opinion in the discussion form for this article, Are Sloppy Résumés OK?.
If you are convinced that hiring is a mission-critical activity, and you are committed to becoming great at hiring, I suggest you read my book, Agile Hiring. It is strikingly different from what has been written before on hiring. Much of the hiring wisdom is still there, but many of the ideas are new. These new ideas have been developed and tested in companies that are committed to hiring great software professionals. They work. I describe the key technical parts of hiring: resume reviews, phone interviews, on-site interviews, and making the offer.
Sean Landis is author of Agile Hiring, which
is available at:|
Sean Landis, a software architect with over twenty years of experience hiring software professionals, has hired in companies with less than ten developers and ones with thousands. He successfully retooled hiring practices at three companies, leading to significant improvements in the quality and quantity of new hires. Sean is a practicing software professional who today practices agile development and has innovatively applied agile principles to hiring.