This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz
by Martin Fowler.
Original Post: ComparativeValues
Feed Title: Martin Fowler's Bliki
Feed URL: http://martinfowler.com/feed.atom
Feed Description: A cross between a blog and wiki of my partly-formed ideas on software development
One of the most striking things about the Manifesto for Agile
Software Development is the format of its values "we favor x
over y". I don't remember who came up with that idea, or
how it arose. It probably just bubbled up as we tossed around ideas.
But it's distinctive format has led a few people to try using that
format again.
If you fancy trying this form, there's a couple of things to
remember about it, things that people don't always realize. The most
important of these is that the unfavored values are valuable
too. A phrase like "solving world hunger over slavery" doesn't
carry much power because hardly anyone is openly in favor of
slavery. The format works when both left and right sides of the
"over" are valuable things that most people want. What the
comparative values then say is that we want both things, but if push
comes to shove we prefer the one on the left. The harder choice
there is between right and left, the better the value statement.
So a good mental test is to imagine someone reversing each value
statement, indeed reversing all that you have in the set. There
should be people that you can imagine proudly and reasonably
supporting that opposite position. In our case we saw much of the
industry heading towards high-ceremony processes - reversing the
values we felt fairly summed up the values of that community. I can
easily imagine writing an article extolling why the reverse set of
values are a coherent world-view for software development by putting
myself into that mind-set.
The right-hand values may be the current state of the world you
want to change, or they may be a future state desired by another
community. Either way the comparative values are there to highlight
the contrast between one and the other.
Another point about the manifesto that I like is its brevity:
four comparative values and twelve principles. It's hard to get that
kind of brevity, but the briefer you make it - the punchier it
is. I'm the manifesto would have not had the impact it did if it had
forty-six value statements.
I'm one of those who has used this format since. Done well it can
really highlight what makes a particular philosophy different to
another. Here is another sample, a set of values I wrote to describe
how I saw ThoughtWorks as being different from other software
organizations.
Leveraging bright people over Making the most of
moderate people
Flexible career paths over Well-defined
roles
Delivering business value over Leading edge
research
Learning new technologies over Mastering established
technologies
Solving difficult problems over Increasing market
share
Learning from mistakes over Avoidance of taking
risks
Delivery to the client over Quarterly results
We've since replaced this list with another
set of principles which try to capture how we want to be. But we
did use the comparative values for a while to try to explain both to
ourselves and others what made our aspirations different.
As such I think that not just is this format a good way to sum up
a world view, when done well it also leads to sharp discussions
about what people really want to care about. This usefulness comes
directly from the fact that you are making hard choices between
things that are all desirable.